Learning Analytics and the Abolitionist Imagination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2023.7813Keywords:
learning analytics, abolition, justice, speculative futures, power, research paperAbstract
This article advances an abolitionist reframing of learning analytics (LA) that explores the benefits of productive disorientation, considers potential harms and care made possible by LA, and suggests the abolitionist imagination as an important educational practice. By applying abolitionist concepts to LA, we propose it may be feasible to open new critiques and social futures that build toward equity-oriented LA design and implementation. We introduce speculative methods to advance three vignettes imagining how LA could be weaponized against students or transformed into a justice-directed learning tool. Our speculative methods aim to destabilize where power in LA has been routinely located and contested, thereby opening new lines of inquiry about more equitable educational prospects. Our concluding discussion addresses how speculative design and fiction are complementary methods to the abolitionist imagination and can be pragmatic tools to help build a world with fairer, more equitable, and responsible LA technologies.
References
Acheson, R. (2022). Abolishing state violence: A world beyond bombs, borders, and cages. Haymarket Books.
Alexander, M. (2011). The new Jim Crow. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 9(1), 7–26. http://hdl.handle.net/1811/73367
Alexander, M. (2020). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.
Benjamin, R. (2019a). The new Jim code: Race, carceral technoscience, and liberatory imagination in everyday life. UC Berkely. https://400years.berkeley.edu/videos/newjimcode
Benjamin, R. (2019b). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Polity Books.
Bristol, T. J., & Mentor, M. (2018). Policing and teaching: The positioning of Black male teachers as agents in the universal carceral apparatus. The Urban Review, 50(2), 218–234. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11256-018-0447-z
Buckingham Shum, S. (2019). Critical data studies, abstraction & learning analytics: Editorial to Selwyn’s LAK keynote and invited commentaries. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(3), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.63.2
Colorado State University. (2017). Ethical principles of learning analytics. https://www.chhs.colostate.edu/alt/ethical-principles-of-learning-analytics/
Crenshaw, K. W., Ocen, P., & Nanda, J. (2015). Black girls matter: Pushed out, overpoliced and under protected. African American Policy Forum. https://44bbdc6e-01a4-4a9a-88bc-731c6524888e.filesusr.com/ugd/b77e03_e92d6e80f7034f30bf843ea7068f52d6.pdf
Cullors, P. (2018). When they call you a terrorist: A Black Lives Matter memoir. St. Martin’s Press.
Davis, A. Y. (2003). Are prisons obsolete? Seven Stories Press.
D2L. (2022). D2L higher education products. Desire 2 Learn. https://www.d2l.com/higher-education/products/performance/
Dollinger, M., Liu, D., Arthars, N., & Lodge, J. M. (2019). Working together in learning analytics towards the co-creation of value. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.2
Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative everything: Design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press.
Elouazizi, N. (2014). Critical factors in data governance for learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2014.13.25
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.
Essa, A. (2019). Is data dark? Lessons from Borges’s “Funes the Memorius.” Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(3), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.63.7
French, G., Goodman, C., Carlson, C., & Tapia, R. (2019). What is the carceral state? Documenting criminalization and confinement. U-M Carceral State Project. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/7ab5f5c3fbca46c38f0b2496bcaa5ab0
Ferguson, R. (2019). Ethical challenges for learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(3), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.63.5
Galloway, A., & Caudwell, C. (2018). Speculative design as research method: From answers to questions and “staying with the trouble.” In G. Coombs, A. McNamara, & G. Sade (Eds.), Undesign: Critical practices at the intersection of art and design (pp. 85–96). Routledge. https://anthrodesign.wordsinspace.net/2019/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Galloway_SpeculativeDesignRschMethod.pdf
García Peña, L. (2022). Community as rebellion: A syllabus for surviving academia as a woman of color. Haymarket Books.
Garza, A. (2016). Who do you serve, who do you protect? Police violence and resistance in the United States. Haymarket Books.
Gilliard, C. (2017). Pedagogy and the logic of platforms. EDUCAUSE Review, 52(4), 64. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/7/pedagogy-and-the-logic-of-platforms
Gilmore, W. R. (2021). Change everything: Racial capitalism and the case for abolition. Haymarket Books.
Hallman, H. L. (2019). Personalized learning through 1:1 technology initiatives: Implications for teachers and teaching in neoliberal times. Teaching Education, 30(3), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1466874
Harrington, C., & Dillahunt, T. R. (2021, May). Eliciting tech futures among Black young adults: A case study of remote speculative co-design. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21), 8–13 May 2021, Yokohama, Japan (Paper No. 397). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445723
Jones, K. M. L., Asher, A., Goben, A., Perry, M. R., Salo, D., Briney, K. A., & Robertshaw, M. B. (2020a). “We’re being tracked at all times”: Student perspectives of their privacy in relation to learning analytics in higher education. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(9), 1044–1059. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24358
Jones, K. M. L., Briney, K. A., Goben, A., Salo, D., Asher, A., & Perry, M. R. (2020b). A comprehensive primer to library learning analytics practices, initiatives, and privacy issues. College & Research Libraries, 81(3), 570–591. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.3.570
Johnson, J. A. (2017). Ethics and justice in learning analytics. New Directions for Higher Education, 2017(179), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20245
Kaba, M., Murakawa, N., & Nopper, T. K. (2021). We do this ’til we free us: Abolitionist organizing and transforming justice. Haymarket Books.
Khalil, M., Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2022). The use and application of learning theory in learning analytics: A scoping review. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09340-3
Love, B. L. (2019). We want to do more than survive: Abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom. Beacon Press.
Lury, C., & Wakeford, N. (2012). Inventive methods: The happening of the social. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203854921
Mackinnon, A. (2021, May 24). Russia’s surveillance state struggles to wean itself off the west. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/05/24/russia-surveillance-technology-western-companies-facial-recognition/
Mohapatra, M., Raven, L., Amuchie, N., Sultan, R., Agbebiyi, K., Hamid, S. T., & Kuo, R. (2020). 8 to abolition: Abolitionist policy changes to demand from your city officials. https://dataspace.princeton.edu/bitstream/88435/dsp011r66j429x/1/8toAbolition_V2.pdf
Myhre, K. (2018). A love song, a death rattle, a battle cry. Button Poetry.
Nix, N. (2017). Black girls 6 times as likely to be suspended as whites. ‘Let Her Learn’ looks to reverse the trend. The 74 Million. https://www.the74million.org/article/black-girls-6-times-more-likely-to-be-suspended-than-whites-let-her-learn-looks-to-reverse-the-trend/
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown.
Pargman, T. C., & McGrath, C. (2021). Mapping the ethics of learning analytics in higher education: A systematic literature review of empirical research. Journal of Learning Analytics, 8(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2021.1
Prinsloo, P. (2019). Commentary on Neil Selwyn’s LAK18 keynote address. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(3), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.63.4
Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2016). Student vulnerability, agency, and learning analytics: An exploration. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(1), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.31.10
Rose, C. P. (2019). Monolith, multiplicity, or multivocality: What do we stand for and where do we go from here? Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(3), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.63.6
Ross, J. (2017). Speculative method in digital education research. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1160927
Roth, K. R., & Ritter, Z. S. (2021). Whiteness, power, and resisting change in US higher education: A peculiar institution. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-57292-1
Ryan-Mosley, T. (2021, April 9). The NYPD used a controversial facial recognition tool: Here’s what you need to know. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/04/09/1022240/clearview-ai-nypd-emails/
Sedrakyan, G., Malmberg, J., Verbert, K., Järvelä, S., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020). Linking learning behavior analytics and learning science concepts: Designing a learning analytics dashboard for feedback to support learning regulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, 105512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.004
Selwyn, N. (2019). What’s the problem with learning analytics? Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(3), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.63.3
Selwyn, N. (2020). Re-imagining ‘Learning Analytics’… a case for starting again? The Internet and Higher Education, 46, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100745
Skirpan, M., & Yeh, T. (2017). Designing a moral compass for the future of computer vision using speculative analysis. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2017), 21–26 July 2017, Honolulu, HI, USA (pp. 64–73). IEEE Computer Society. https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_cvpr_2017_workshops/w16/papers/Yeh_Designing_a_Moral_CVPR_2017_paper.pdf
Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510–1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479366
Swauger, S. (2021). Leaving surveillance tech behind in higher education: Towards trust and abolition. Othering and Belonging Institute. https://belonging.berkeley.edu/leaving-surveillance-tech-behind-higher-education-towards-trust-and-abolition
Taylor, A. (2017). Perspectives on the university as a business: The corporate management structure, neoliberalism and higher education. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 15(1), 108–135. http://www.jceps.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/15-1-6.pdf
Toliver, S. R. (2021). Recovering Black storytelling in qualitative research: Endarkened storywork. Routledge.
Uttamchandani, S., & Quick, J. (2022). An introduction to fairness, absence of bias, and equity in learning analytics. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, A. F. Wise, D. Gašević, & A. Merceron (Eds.), Handbook of learning analytics (pp. 205–212). https://solaresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/hla22/HLA22_Chapter_20_Uttamchandani.pdf
Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., & Mavroudi, A. (2018). The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.027
Vitale, A. S. (2021). The end of policing. Verso Books.
Virvou, M., Alepis, E., Tsihrintzis, G. A., & Jain, L. C. (2019). Machine learning paradigms. In M. Virvou, E. Alepis, G. A. Tsihrintzis, & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Machine learning paradigms: Advances in learning analytics (pp. 1–5). Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 158. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13743-4_1
Watters, A. (2021). Teaching machines: The history of personalized learning. MIT Press.
Wise, A. F., Sarmiento, J. P., & Boothe Jr, M. (2021). Subversive learning analytics. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ’21), 12–16 April 2021, Irvine, CA, USA (pp. 639–645). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448139.3448210
Wong, R. Y., & Khovanskaya, V. (2018). Speculative design in HCI: From corporate imaginations to critical orientations. In M. Filimowicz & V. Tzankova (Eds.), New directions in third wave human–computer interaction, Volume 2: Methodologies (pp. 175–202). Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73374-6_10
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Learning Analytics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
TEST
